How the application creates personalized scripts
Your goal, required safety checks, selected source material and a written review come before optional narration.
Al Hypnosis editorial team
Published: Updated:
- Personalization
- Privacy
Editorial team source review: 2026-09-16. Clinical, legal, and native-Arabic review are pending.
Sources checked:
Begin with your words and choices
The signed-in personalized path starts by asking what you would like support with today. Relevant follow-up questions help clarify the request, alongside required safety and setting questions.
Adult eligibility and current policy acceptance are required. Sensitive-data consent is a separate choice. Privacy choices show the currently selected processing providers; a relevant provider or processing-context change requires renewed consent before further sensitive processing.
Screen the request and select a method
The server applies safety rules before asking a text provider to generate a script. A request may need clarification, be stopped, or receive a neutral general-relaxation alternative. A general fallback does not send the original concern to the text provider.
Approved categories select bounded material derived from practitioner sources. Source selection guides technique and supports internal traceability; it is not clinical evidence that the generated session works.
What public evidence can support
Clinical evidence for hypnosis comes from defined clinical settings, not this application. Jones and colleagues pooled 70 randomized trials with 6,078 adults with clinical pain. The trials compared hypnosis added to a primary intervention with the primary intervention alone and reported small additional pain-intensity differences in some comparator contexts. The review rated the overall certainty very low; it does not establish an effect for a self-guided, generated wellness session.
SIO-ASCO guidance is for clinicians caring for adults with cancer pain. It says hypnosis may be recommended for procedural pain, not as a general cancer-pain treatment or as evidence for this app.
In a 60-participant insomnia trial, disease-specific and generic suggestions had no significant between-group difference in sleep efficiency. It did not test individual AI tailoring, generic AI prompts, self-guided recordings, or this app. It cannot establish benefit or no benefit for those approaches.
IBS research is clinical background, not an app treatment category. ACG conditionally suggests gut-directed psychotherapy for global IBS symptoms on very-low-quality evidence. A 2024 network review of 42 trials with 5,220 adults found no treatment was superior and no trial was low risk of bias across all domains.
- Jones et al. 2024: adjunctive clinical pain review (PubMed 39263007)
- Mao et al. 2022: SIO-ASCO oncology pain guideline (PubMed 36122322)
- Lam et al. 2018: generic versus disease-specific suggestions for insomnia (PubMed 30477846)
- Lacy et al. 2021: ACG IBS guideline (PubMed 33315591)
- Goodoory et al. 2024: IBS network meta-analysis (PubMed 38777133)
What the process adds to a generic AI prompt
The signed-in path uses your stated concern, language, current setting, required safety answers, available duration, sleep choice, and any imagery you ask to avoid. For an allowed request, the service selects a bounded wellness category and related original-prose guidance. Requests can be limited, stopped, or offered neutral general relaxation before generation.
Compared with asking a generic AI to write a script, this product adds a defined workflow: server-side screening before text generation, category- and context-bound method selection, a waking ending by default, and a sleep transition only after an affirmative safe-in-bed choice. You can read the whole written draft before optional narration.
These controls describe the product process. They do not establish that this app is clinically suitable for you, clinically effective, or better than a generic AI response or recording.
Check the written draft
The application checks the script’s structure, safety boundaries and ending. A sleep transition requires an eligible request and affirmative safe-setting choice; ordinary sessions return to alertness. These checks do not replace clinical judgment.
When a result is available, you can read the full generated draft before choosing narration or saving it. Live text and narration providers are disabled by default in this version. Offline examples are labeled and do not demonstrate live personalization or voice quality.
Control what is kept
The new personalized page keeps raw descriptions and follow-up fields in page memory, without saving them to the interview profile. Leaving or reloading can lose work that has not produced a completed draft. For a completed signed-in draft, one separate temporary recovery record may be available for up to 24 hours. It contains the canonical generated result and limited session metadata, not raw descriptions, free-text answers, raw prompts, or a substitute saved session. A script you choose to save may reflect sensitive details you shared.
The separate guided interview saves eligible signed-in answers, with required consent, when generation is requested, including when generation later fails. A temporary recovery record is inaccessible after expiry; scheduled or lifecycle cleanup physically deletes it when it runs. Withdrawing sensitive-data consent or deleting the account blocks access immediately; withdrawal cleanup can remain pending if it fails. Account controls let you export data, clear that profile, withdraw sensitive-data consent or delete active account data.